Search

 

Disclaimer 

In October 2012 our shortened URL (www.thewillandthewallet.org) expired and was purchased by spammers before we were able to reclaim it. Part of their misuse includes redirecting this URL to an imposter site that has advertisements posted in the comment boxes. Stimson is working to take down that site and reclaim the domain name. In the interim, please update your bookmarks accordingly to www.thewillandthewallet.squarespace.com. Thank you all for your patience as we work through this issue.

Picture This

(Gallup)

Wordwise

“Modest reforms to pay and compensation will improve readiness and modernization. It will help keep our all-volunteer force sustainable and strong. Keeping faith also means investing sufficient resources so that we can uphold our sacred obligations to defend the nation and to send our sons and daughters to war with only the best training, leadership and equipment. We can’t shrink from our obligations to one another. The stakes are too high.”

Gen. Martin E. Dempsey

« Budget Resolution Update: International Affairs | Main | “Trillions to Burn?” asks new Project on Defense Alternatives report »
Thursday
Nov291990

Differences Between Obama and Appropriations War Supplementals

The House is expected to vote this week on the second FY2009 war supplemental. There are a number of differences between the Obama administration’s request and the bill that was voted out of the Appropriations Committee. President Obama requested a total of $75.5 billion for the Department of Defense and $7.1 billion for international affairs while the House Appropriations Committee gave $84.5 billion to the Pentagon and $10 billion for international affairs. Below is a short analysis of the major differences between the president’s request and the Appropriations Committee’s bill.

The committee added significant funding to nearly all DOD personnel accounts, increasing Army funding by $730 million (7.2%) and the Air Force by $393 million (28.2%). However, in order to do so, the Appropriations Committee cut nearly all Operations and Maintenance (O&M) accounts. O&M defense-wide fell by $313 million (5.5%) while each of the services had smaller decreases.

Procurement was mixed, with some programs, such as the Air Force aircraft procurement account, increasing, while Marine Corps and Air Force missile funding decreased. Much of the aircraft procurement increase can be attributed to the Committee’s addition of funds for new transport planes, such as the C-17 and C-130.

Research, Development, Testing and Evaluation (RDT&E) was uniformly decreased by the Appropriations Committee, while MRAP procurement was increased by $2.2 billion. The committee increased food aid and peacekeeping operations funding by approximately 66%. Military Construction funding was increased, with large amounts going to build new hospitals and refurbish old ones. The largest percentage increase is to the Foreign Military Financing (FMF) account, which the committee added unrequested funds for security assistance to Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Mexico

The Obama administration requested $400 million for the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF). With the concurrence of the Secretary of State, these funds would go to Pentagon efforts to train and equip Pakistan military and security forces as well as funding stabilization and reconstruction activities in Pakistan. However, as Budget Insight noted last week, modifications made by the committee led to changes in the management of the fund.  According to the House bill, $400 million will be made available to DOD for the PCCF through FY 2010.  In addition, another $400 million will be made available to the State Department beginning in FY 2010 and expiring at the end of the fiscal year.  The committee intends that as the State Department builds its capacity to manage and implement the PCCF, funds for the program will go solely to the State Department.

SELECTED MAJOR SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING CHANGES



All Figures in Millions of $

 

Obama Request

Appropriations Committee

Difference

% Change


 

Personnel, Army

10,195

10,925

730

7.2%


 

Personnel, Air Force

1,391

1,783

392

28.2%


 

O&M, Defense-Wide

5,667

5,354

-313

-5.5%


 

O&M, Air National Guard

203

178

-25

-12.3%


 

Air Force, Aircraft Procurement

2,379

5,138

2,759

116.0%


 

National Guard &Reserve Procurement

0

500

500

Infinite


 

RDT&E, Navy

145

96

-49

-33.8%


 

RDT&E, Air Force

108

93

-15

-13.9%


 

P.L 480 Food Aid

300

500

200

66.7%


 

Peacekeeping Operations

50

80

30

60.0%


 

Foreign Military Financing

98

1,349

1,251

1276.5%


 

PCCF

400

400

0

0.0%


Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>