Search

 

Disclaimer 

In October 2012 our shortened URL (www.thewillandthewallet.org) expired and was purchased by spammers before we were able to reclaim it. Part of their misuse includes redirecting this URL to an imposter site that has advertisements posted in the comment boxes. Stimson is working to take down that site and reclaim the domain name. In the interim, please update your bookmarks accordingly to www.thewillandthewallet.squarespace.com. Thank you all for your patience as we work through this issue.

Picture This

(Gallup)

Wordwise

“Modest reforms to pay and compensation will improve readiness and modernization. It will help keep our all-volunteer force sustainable and strong. Keeping faith also means investing sufficient resources so that we can uphold our sacred obligations to defend the nation and to send our sons and daughters to war with only the best training, leadership and equipment. We can’t shrink from our obligations to one another. The stakes are too high.”

Gen. Martin E. Dempsey

« Pentagon’s Hill advocates help it escape now, maybe not later | Main | Our New Look »
Monday
Aug012011

The Debt Deal and Defense Spending

Defense spending made out pretty well in the debt deal.  Despite all of the claims, the only immediate impact of the deal on defense is the FY12 and FY13 cap on "security," which includes DoD, NNSA, function 150 international affairs, the intelligence community management account, and the Departments of Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs.  The FY12 security cap is $5B lower than the final FY11 discretionary number for security. So even if DoD ate all of that reduction it would be less than a 1% cut from FY11.  

The White House is claiming $350B in defense savings, presumably by extrapolating out from the FY12 and FY 13 caps.  But that is an assumption.  Nothing in the deal mandates those savings. 

Defense is included as part of the sequester if the second round called for in the deal, the super committee that is supposed to report additional savings by this November, doesn't come up with additional savings. If so, the caps apply not to "security" but to budget function 050, which is DoD plus Department of Energy nuclear funding and some other defense funding in DHS and the FBI.  And the deal sets out what the funding for 050 throughout the next decade would be in the absence of an agreement.  

If the sequester does kick in, 050 would be reduced by more than those caps.  The deal includes a fairly complicated formula, but basically the function 050 numbers set out by the bill would be reduced by half of the needed $1.2T savings, distributed over nine years and between discretionary and mandatory.  (Mandatory makes up about 1% of all 050 spending--so the vast bulk of the reduction would be in discretionary).  

Finally, war funding is basically exempt from the deal.  As long as Congress and the President designate funding as Overseas Contingency Operations funding, the caps are raised by that amount.  Its probably good to have a safety valve to fund our troops in the field*--but it'll be interesting to see if the Pentagon, administration, and Congress can resist hiding other defense spending in this money free from all the restrictions of this deal.

Defense was definitely on the table during this debt deal.  But it look likes most of defense was left on the table.  

* The deal also allows the President to exempt military personnel costs from sequestration, meaning no troops go unpaid.  

Obviously this is a complicated bill, and this is our best reading so far.  We'll update the post if anything we say doesn't bear out. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>