Search

 

Disclaimer 

In October 2012 our shortened URL (www.thewillandthewallet.org) expired and was purchased by spammers before we were able to reclaim it. Part of their misuse includes redirecting this URL to an imposter site that has advertisements posted in the comment boxes. Stimson is working to take down that site and reclaim the domain name. In the interim, please update your bookmarks accordingly to www.thewillandthewallet.squarespace.com. Thank you all for your patience as we work through this issue.

Picture This

(Gallup)

Wordwise

Anyone who has heard President Dwight Eisenhower's 1961 farewell address knows that there is a political nexus that links the Defense Department to its contractors. But Ike conveniently left out the middle player who makes the game possible: Congress.

Gordon Adams, Foreign Policy

« The Senator from Lockheed Objects! | Main | A new goal »
Wednesday
Aug242011

Savings Mirages

On January 6, former Secretary of Defense Gates stated that the military services had identified “savings that totaled approximately $100 billion over five years.” Among the now well-known efficiency savings was a proposal by the Air Force that would allow it to save “$500 million by reducing fuel and energy consumption within the Air Mobility Command (AMC).”

The Air Force accounts for 64% of the armed forces’ fuel costs, and 84% of that is utilized for aviation purposes (see p. 4 for synopsis of Air Force Energy Use), which is mostly managed by AMC, so fuel efficiencies could theoretically lead to large savings.

AMC concluded this February during the AMC Fuel Efficiency Office’s inaugural conference that it had saved $83 million in fuel costs since 2008. It has projected that it could achieve, with currently identified initiatives, “a total yearly reduction of 116.4 million gallons at a cost avoidance of $382.2 million.”

But this Tuesday Undersecretary of the Air Force Erin Conaton noted that rising fuel costs have significantly undercut the AMC’s intended efficiency savings:

We’re just going to have to watch the financial side of the equation…The Cost of fuel keeps going up, so even though we’re saving gallons, we’re not necessarily seeing that impact yet.

As The Will and the Wallet noted when the efficiencies were first announced, many of these savings—even when they are good ideas in and of themselves—may not actually help reduce the defense budget.  Unfortunately, fuel costs are proving to be all too good an example of how illusory it is to try and cut the defense budget only with efficiency measures.   

Reader Comments (1)

A good way to save a lot of fuel, especially for the Air Force, but also for the Army, Navy, and Marines, is to get out of Afghanistan soonest, and especially to wind down that long logistics train to the end of the world. (Getting out of Iraq helps,too -- even if we end leaving a few trainers there, they won't be big fuel consumers.) And then, not getting into another war like that for another generation, at which point petroleum will have run out around the world anyway.

August 24, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterHank Gaffney

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>