In October 2012 our shortened URL ( expired and was purchased by spammers before we were able to reclaim it. Part of their misuse includes redirecting this URL to an imposter site that has advertisements posted in the comment boxes. Stimson is working to take down that site and reclaim the domain name. In the interim, please update your bookmarks accordingly to Thank you all for your patience as we work through this issue.

Picture This



“Modest reforms to pay and compensation will improve readiness and modernization. It will help keep our all-volunteer force sustainable and strong. Keeping faith also means investing sufficient resources so that we can uphold our sacred obligations to defend the nation and to send our sons and daughters to war with only the best training, leadership and equipment. We can’t shrink from our obligations to one another. The stakes are too high.”

Gen. Martin E. Dempsey

« Managed, Not Hacked | Main | Low man on the totem pole »

Special Status

Budgets indicate how a government prioritizes its responsibilities. As we have shown before, over the past decade defense spending budgets have trended upward significantly. In fact, the FY2012 defense budget request was fully 110% higher than defense spending in FY2001.

The special status that defense enjoys is perhaps best shown by a breakdown of how frequently stand-alone defense appropriations bills are passed, rather than lumped together with Omnibuses and Consolidated Appropriations Bills.

The table to the left indicates that from 2001-2011, Defense and Homeland Security enjoyed privileged status as they were wrapped into consolidated bills only twice. Further emphasizing this dynamic, the Military Construction bill was passed as a stand-alone bill every year it was by itself.  When Veterans funding—hardly politically unpopular funding—was added to that bill, it has been wrapped into consolidated bills every year since FY06. 

On the other hand, the table shows that State and Foreign Operations has not enjoyed such privileges, as it has been wrapped up in consolidated bills every year since 2003 (except 2006). Despite efforts—including ours—to stress the role of international affairs funding in our national security, State and Foreign Ops remains politically weak

Never has Defense’s special consideration been more obvious than in FY2011, when a continuing resolution for the rest of discretionary spending was tacked on to an actual appropriations bill for defense, clearly setting Defense apart as a budgetary priority.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>