Search

 

Disclaimer 

In October 2012 our shortened URL (www.thewillandthewallet.org) expired and was purchased by spammers before we were able to reclaim it. Part of their misuse includes redirecting this URL to an imposter site that has advertisements posted in the comment boxes. Stimson is working to take down that site and reclaim the domain name. In the interim, please update your bookmarks accordingly to www.thewillandthewallet.squarespace.com. Thank you all for your patience as we work through this issue.

Picture This

(Gallup)

Wordwise

Anyone who has heard President Dwight Eisenhower's 1961 farewell address knows that there is a political nexus that links the Defense Department to its contractors. But Ike conveniently left out the middle player who makes the game possible: Congress.

Gordon Adams, Foreign Policy

« Less a Matter of International Diplomacy... | Main | It's a Seller's Market »
Tuesday
Apr102012

Making a Hard Choice

Ship maintenance and other readiness accounts have long been underfunded in response to budget pressures. A recent article in Stars and Stripes highlights that that is not the case this year as the Navy’s readiness accounts are increasing

The 2013 budget sent to Congress by the president would increase ship maintenance spending by 12 percent, to about $5.1 billion, excluding ship depot funding.

The increase in Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funding for the Navy is part of a larger narrative – O&M is increasing for all services, up nearly $12 billion from FY12. A large portion of this funding is essentially being transferred from OCO funding, which had served as an escape hatch protecting readiness funds in the past decade. As BFAD’s own Russell Rumbaugh said:

For the first time, we seem to be seeing a genuine effort to institutionalize funding that has been paid for in war budgets, but is necessary to operate our forces whether or not we are at war… This shift represents a positive step in ensuring the enduring costs necessary to maintain our forces are paid for in the base budget, not the temporary war funding.

Its impressive the Defense Department—despite facing significant budgetary pressures—still found a way to move these key funds the right direction—into the enduring base budget.