Search

 

Disclaimer 

In October 2012 our shortened URL (www.thewillandthewallet.org) expired and was purchased by spammers before we were able to reclaim it. Part of their misuse includes redirecting this URL to an imposter site that has advertisements posted in the comment boxes. Stimson is working to take down that site and reclaim the domain name. In the interim, please update your bookmarks accordingly to www.thewillandthewallet.squarespace.com. Thank you all for your patience as we work through this issue.

Picture This

(Gallup)

Wordwise

“Modest reforms to pay and compensation will improve readiness and modernization. It will help keep our all-volunteer force sustainable and strong. Keeping faith also means investing sufficient resources so that we can uphold our sacred obligations to defend the nation and to send our sons and daughters to war with only the best training, leadership and equipment. We can’t shrink from our obligations to one another. The stakes are too high.”

Gen. Martin E. Dempsey

« Saudi Deal Skews Arms Sales Trend | Main | Unpacking the Navy’s Pacific Shift »
Thursday
Aug302012

Sequestration and Defense Cuts: A Tale of Two Polls

National defense cuts have remained a significant part of recent political debate, with defense contractors threatening mass layoffs in the event of sequester. The Hill cited the results of our public opinion survey Tuesday while reporting on the latest lobbying effort to stop sequestration cuts:

A joint survey from the Stimson Center, Center for Public Integrity and Program for Public Consultation released in the spring found that respondents wanted to cut the Pentagon budget an additional $103 billion, after they were provided arguments supporting and opposing further cuts to the Pentagon budget.

Contextually, The Hill was comparing our findings to a new Aerospace Industries Association poll, which found that “80 percent of likely voters in five swing states… agree that sequestration should be reversed before the election.”

Questioning how two polls could show seemingly opposite public opinion data, The Hill rightly points out just how differently the two polls were framed. More importantly, however, the two polls actually asked entirely different questions. While the AIA poll only asked respondents whether or not they thought leaders in Washington should find an alternative to “sequestration,” our poll never actually used the word, and it was never intended to poll on the concept — instead we wanted to examine what Americans would do with the defense budget themselves, if they were given the opportunity, and they overwhelming made significant cuts.

In any case, it is good to see that our polling data is continuing to inform the debate.