In October 2012 our shortened URL ( expired and was purchased by spammers before we were able to reclaim it. Part of their misuse includes redirecting this URL to an imposter site that has advertisements posted in the comment boxes. Stimson is working to take down that site and reclaim the domain name. In the interim, please update your bookmarks accordingly to Thank you all for your patience as we work through this issue.

Picture This



“Modest reforms to pay and compensation will improve readiness and modernization. It will help keep our all-volunteer force sustainable and strong. Keeping faith also means investing sufficient resources so that we can uphold our sacred obligations to defend the nation and to send our sons and daughters to war with only the best training, leadership and equipment. We can’t shrink from our obligations to one another. The stakes are too high.”

Gen. Martin E. Dempsey

« Budgeteers to the Rescue | Main | Figuring Out Air Force Modernization »

Other Side of the Sequester Coin

Stimson’s own Russell Rumbaugh joined Minnesota Public Radio on the air last week for a discussion of the future of American defense spending amid looming automatic reductions. The theme of the discussion quickly became the willingness of the American public to cut defense expenditures. Russell pointed out that, while there is bipartisan agreement that sequestration is bad policy,

There is [also] a great deal of agreement about what we should do with defense, and that is: spend less.

Stimson’s summertime defense spending poll vividly displays this preference.  Respondents overwhelmingly made significant cuts to defense when given the chance to change the budget as they saw fit.  It’s just one cause among many for the downward budgetary trend, even if sequester is averted.